NEW YORK -- Its proponents, including Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger and the Dean of the School of International and Public Affairs, contended that having Iranian Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speak on campus would be a big step in the direction of mutual understanding.
Instead, Bollinger and Columbia University stepped into a black hole of shame, from which there is no escape.
What has the passage of a year wrought?
Only a better understanding of just how misguided Bollinger, John H. Coatsworth (the SIPA Dean), Richard W. Bulliet (the professor who initiated the A-Jad invitation) and the entire Columbia University Board of Trustees were.
Columbia University was played to the max by Ahmadinejad, who basked in the credibility his appearance provided for his gay-bashing, women-stoning, anti-American, destroy-Israel agenda. Bollinger and Columbia University have been accessories to every action of A-Jad since September 24, 2007. And, Bollinger and Columbia University will go down in history as having been duped by one of the 21st Century's most evil leaders.
What else has time revealed about the 2007 A-Jad speech at Columbia? Like a politician who serves his or her entire career with distinction, and then is caught in a lurid scandal, Columbia’s biographers and obituary writers will forever associate the school with a man who openly calls for Holocaust II against the Jewish people and the State of Israel.
We strongly suspect that Columbia has paid a financial price, as well, for its embrace of A-Jad. We know alumni donors who’ve cut or eliminated their contributions to the school in the wake of the September 24th blasphemy. And really, there is no way to know which major domo donors who might have once considered a major gift to Columbia have reconsidered.
One year later A-Jad and his hate-filled regime are stronger and more menacing than ever. As for Bollinger, Coatsworth, Bulliet and the other vermin who disgraced themselves and their university, we see no signs that they’ve managed to redeem their tarnished reputations even an iota.
In Jewish tradition, one remembers those who have died each year on the anniversary of their deaths by saying a special Yizkor prayer and lighting a candle. This September 24th, many Columbia University alumni and friends of the school will be lighting a candle for Columbia University to commemorate the day its morality perished.
Who among this year's class of Pulitizer Prize winners has the guts, the class and the wisdom not to accept their award from Lee C. Bollinger, president of Columbia Unveristy, which administers the competition?
Will Walt Bogdanich, a New York Times investigative reporter and a three-time winner, have the moral clarity to say, "No. Not from Bollinger"?
How about Michael Ramirez of Investor's Business Daily, who won for editorial cartooning; or Steven Pearlstein of The Washington Post, cited for his newspaper commentary?
Maybe musical legend Bob Dylan, who received a special citation for his "lyrical compositions of extraordinary ...<< MORE >>
As anyone who knows me well already knows, most of my father's family perished during the Holocaust and he was interred at Auschwitz, so I'm quite familiar with the potential consequences of letting Ahmadinejad speak unchallenged at my alma mater.New York, NY -- Lee Carroll Bollinger, the controversial president of Columbia University and a distinguished legal scholar, died yesterday afternoon of a massive coronary attack as he prepared to meet with the school's Board of Trustees.
Paramedics worked feverishly for more than one hour to resuscitate the 61-year-old educator, but he was pronounced dead on the scene before he could be transported to the nearby Columbia University Medical Center.
In a statement, William V. Campbell, chairman of the University's Board of Trustees, said that "all of us at Columbia have lost a great leader and friend in Lee." Campbell added that "although Lee's tenure here was enveloped in controversy and acrimony, the Board always supported him and felt he had his best interests at heart in all of the decisions he made."
Bollinger become president of Columbia in June 2002, after serving as president of the University of Michigan since 1996.
While the Santa Rosa, California native had been involved in various legal and policy controversies throughout his professional career -including standing at the center of two cases before the United States Supreme Court - Bollinger became a global figure only after he permitted Iranian Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on campus on September 24, 2007.
Ahmadinejad's speech, and Bollinger's biting introduction of him, made Bollinger the target of criticism from many quarters. Jewish groups and others felt Bollinger should not have permitted Ahmadinejad to speak on campus, given the Iranian's record of gross human rights violations and Holocaust denial.
Others were outraged by Bollinger's introduction, which they said was unbecoming, given that Ahmadinejad was speaking at the express invitation and with the approval of Columbia and Bollinger.
While others at the University also took heat for the Ahmadinejad-Bollinger speech, as it came to be known, Bollinger alone bore the brunt of the blame.
Lee C. Bollinger, Columbia's Free Speech President, had the power to block Ahmadinejad's speech. But he did not. Bollinger maintained then and has yet to say otherwise, that bestowing upon Ahmadinejad the credibility that came with speaking at Columbia was a price well worth paying for the educational opportunity of hearing and questioning the madman directly.
There is a rumor circulating on the Internet and other venues that Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger is drafting a eulogy that he would like read to commemorate the Palestinian terrorist who earlier this week killed 8 Jewish students in Jerusalem.
Free speech, you see, doesn't apply to the victims of terror, only to the perpetrators. At least, that is how we believe Columbia University views the world.
But whom to believe: Mamhoud Ahmadinejad the full out denier, or Khaled Mashaal (photo) and Mahmoud Abbas, who want to compare their misery to that of the Jews of Europe during World War II, but each of whom has a different version of how little the Jews actually suffered at the hands of the Nazis? 
So says Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who in recent days has ratcheted up his anti-Israel, 'wipe them off the map' rhetoric.Costumes are a traditional part of the festivities that surround the annual Jewish holiday of Purim.
Purim commemorates the reversal of fortune for the Jews of 6th Century Persia, who were facing extermination at the hands of the evil Haman, a trusted adviser to the king. Thanks to the intervention of Queen Esther and her cousin, Mordecai, the king protected the Jews and instead hung Haman on the gallows he, himself, had constructed to kill Jews.

Purim revelers can dress as Ahmadinejad (l)
or Bollinger (r)
At modern Purim carnivals, it is customary for children and adults alike to dress up as Esther, Mordechai and other characters from the biblical story, including Haman.
This year, however, to mark the September 24, 2007 speech by Iranian Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at Columbia University, a group of Columbia alumni and concerned citizens - known as Bnai Haman - are planning an Ahmadinejad-themed Purim festival.
"Ahmadinejad and Haman have a lot in common in that both men plotted to exterminate all the Jews," says a spokeswoman for Bnai Haman, a not-for-profit group of volunteers. "And just as Haman found those in ancient Persia who would listen to his incitements, so too did Columbia University provide a platform for Ahmadinejad to espouse Israel's destruction to a global media audience."
Mohammad Ali Jafari, head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, said on February 18th that Israel will soon be destroyed by Hezbollah, according to a report by Reuters.
"In the near future, we will witness the destruction of the cancerous existence of Israel by the powerful ...<< MORE >>
Las Vegas, NV (February 15, 2008) -- Bnai Haman, a group of Columbia University alumni and concerned citizens, has posted a new statement on its web sites condemning the assassination of Hizbullah’s special operations chief Imad Mughniyeh. Mughniyeh was killed by a car bomb that detonated this past week in Syria, where he was in hiding.
![]() |
| Free-speech advocate Imad Mughniyeh (covering the mouth of TWA pilot.) |
“As Columbia made clear, students and faculty at democratic, free-speech schools can learn so much about the mind of terrorists by inviting them to speak on campus,” says Jed Christianson, a spokesperson for Bnai Haman. “Mughniyeh's credentials in this regard were impeccable and with his untimely death, Columbia and its community are robbed of the opportunity to hear from this influential Middle East leader.”
And so it begins.
Robert Kraft, who continued to funnel large financial contributions to Columbia University even after the University invited Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to disgrace its campus, has tasted the power of the ‘Curse of Ahmadinejad.’
Standby. Kraft is just the first of many Columbia University apologists who will find their once good fortunes bankrupted.
In what many believe is the greatest Super Bowl upset ever, the New York Giants emerged victorious, trumping the previously 18-0 New England Patriots in the final seconds of the game following a truly miraculous 83-yard, 12-play drive. During that drive, Giants quarterback Eli Manning was swarmed under by Patriots defenders, only to emerge from the scrum to throw a game-saving pass to David Tyree, who caught the ball on the tips of his fingers and steadied it with his head as he fell to the ground.
Somewhere in heaven, the spirits of Mordechai and Esther are smiling broadly.
Don’t believe this relates to the Ahmadinejad speech? Don’t believe that Robert Kraft is now cursed? Be patient. In the months and years to come, you will likewise see the dreams and careers of other Columbia University perpetrators – including Lee C. Bollinger, John H. Coatsworth and Richard W. Bulliet – slip through their hands like the Super Bowl XLII trophy that Robert Kraft had oh-so-close to his grasp.
You see, Columbia University committed a crime against decency when it invited Ahmadinejad to speak on campus last September 24th. A-Jad is an avowed anti-gay, anti-women, anti-American, anti-Semite who dreams of nuking Israel and then America off the face of the planet.
| |
| The Limbaugh Letter on A-Jad/Carter |
|
|
![]() |
| Moe Howard | Curly Howard | Larry Fine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| "Stinky" Bollinger | "Dicky" Bulliet | "John-John" |
Santa Monica, CA (PRWEB) December 19, 2007 -- The growing public feud between Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger and Richard W. Bulliet, a professor of Islamic studies, demonstrates the price academics pay when they invite controversial figures to speak on campus, according to Bnai Haman.
As reported in The Washington Post on Sunday, December 16, 2007, Columbia University is still roiled by the speech of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad nearly three months later. Ahmadinejad spoke on campus on September 24, 2007.
![]() |
| Bulliet Backbiting Bollinger |
Now, as the Post reported, Bulliet is openly criticizing Bollinger. "There have been an accumulation of events since Bollinger arrived that have people riled up," Bulliet told the Post. "I have never seen a situation quite like this one, and I've been here for 32 years."
Bnai Haman, a group of Columbia University alumni and concerned citizens, writes on its web site that it isn't surprising to see such infighting surface in the wake of the Ahmadinejad speech.
"Although Lee Bollinger told the Post that he would like to put the speech behind him, the choice isn't his," Bnai Haman says. "The lesson to be learned here by other academic institutions is that actions such as those of Bollinger and Bulliet can derail everything else on your agenda. So think carefully before you step into the abyss."
Bnai Haman is dedicated to reminding the world of the Ahmadinejad speech at Columbia, an event it has dubbed a "stain on the University's soul."
<< MORE >>1. ) Columbia University President Lee Bollinger invites the Iranian president to speak on campus.
2. ) Paris Hilton cries for her mommy.
3. ) Alec Baldwin rips his daughter a new one.
4. ) David Hasselhoff drunk in the ...<< MORE >>
Homeland Security officials scrambled this week when sensors strategically placed throughout Manhattan detected what might be the fumes from poison gas or a major chemical leak.
The applause that members of the audience mounted loudly and often for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will echo through the annals of history in perpetuity alongside the anguished cries of Ahmadinejad's victims.But Columbia's decision to host Ahmadinejad on campus was not of a piece with its previous moves. The problem with the decision was not that it exposed Bollinger and his colleagues as hypocrites. Nor was the principle issue their obvious left-wing political bias. Whether or not Ahmadinejad, who denies the Nazi Holocaust and is gunning for a new one has a right to express his views is similarly not the main issue raised by their move.
THE PROBLEM with Columbia's action, the reason that there can be no moral justification for the university's decision, is because ...<< MORE >>
``I think it is disgusting that Columbia is having this Haman, this Hitler, speak here,'' said Harv Hilowitz, referring to an ancient Persian official who ordered the killing of Jews and to Adolf Hitler, who led Germany during the mass murder of Jews during World War II.
Hilowitz, a graduate of Columbia's Teacher's College who traveled two hours from Kingston, New York, to protest outside Columbia, said, while waving an Israeli flag, that freedom of speech shouldn't be afforded to ``dictators'' like Ahmadinejad.
Janine Zacharia and Henry Goldman
Bloomberg News
9/24/07
The president’s irrelevant U.N. speech was a bad combo with the schoolyard name-calling of Lee Bollinger. Even some in the anti-Ahmadinejad audience gasped a bit as Columbia’s president gave the meanest introduction in the history of introductions — one that only managed to elevate the creep sitting on stage with his thugs. Once you’ve made the decision to invite a tyrannical leader, you can’t undo it by belittling him in public. Universities are supposed to be places where you can debate and hear dissenting voices; it would have been far better just to hand the mike ...<< MORE >>
But this is different. Bollinger - to the applause of some and the reluctant admiration of many - has taken advantage of the sacrifice of our men and women under arms verbally to slap Ahmadinejad around.
He forgets that the only thing holding Ahmadinejad in check is our military power (which, in turn, is deployed only by our civil authorities). His performance, however skilled, was illusory and narcissistic, both for himself and for his admiring audience, precisely because Bollinger and his cultured admirers deliberately forget that it is not human ideals that defeats human nature, ...<< MORE >>
“I was glad to hear how strongly he [Lee C. Bollinger] condemned him [A-Jad],” he added. “But I don’t think it makes up for the invitation. With someone who denies the Holocaust, who wants to destroy Israel and to turn the Western world into an Islamic caliphate, there is not room to have discussion. It is like discussing with the Ku Klux Klan whether blacks are inferior.”
Elliot Mathia, Director of Hasbara Fellowships
New York Times
9/26/07
"I am very much in favor of freedom of expression," Peres told reporters..., "but what happened at Columbia University was giving a platform to the greatest lies in the world. Everyone knows that Iran is building an atomic bomb and is a hotbed of world terror."
Addressing remarks by the university's president, Lee Bollinger, who called Ahmadinejad a "petty and cruel dictator" but said he would have invited Hitler to speak, Peres said that "even Chamberlain and Hitler met for diplomatic talks, and behind all those nice words was genocide and one of the worst atrocities ...<< MORE >>
All in all, it was a fiasco for America and a blunder by Bollinger, as well as a coup for Ahmadinejad. His goal was not to respond to Bollinger, the Columbia students or Americans seeing him on television. His goal was to talk over their heads to the Islamic world and its terrorists and show how he bearded the Columbia lion in its own den.
President Bollinger, as an encore, why not invite Hugo Chavez? I think he'd come. You could provide him with a platform ...<< MORE >>
So there is Adolf Hitler on our imagined stage, ranting about the soon-to-be-fulfilled destiny of the Aryan race. And his audience of outstanding Columbia men are mostly appalled, as they should be. But they are also engrossed, and curious, and if it occurs to some of them that the man should be arrested on the spot they don't say it. Nor do they ask, "How will we come to terms with his world?" Instead, they wonder how to make him see "reason," as reasonable people do.
In just a few years, some of these men will ...<< MORE >>
Bollinger did this because he knows he's in trouble — that many Americans believe Bollinger himself is a villain.
That's because the president touts freedom of speech, but took weak action against the Columbia students who threatened the leader of the Minutemen. — You remember that. And Bollinger has supported the banning of ROTC on campus. Does that sound like freedom of speech to you?
Bill O'Reilly, Fox News
Talking Points Memo
9/25/07